• Home
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • ITEP In Action
    • Staff
    • ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model
    • Funding
    • Board of Directors
    • Employment
    • Contact
    • Join Email List
  • State Information
      • Alabama
      • Alaska
      • Arizona
      • Arkansas
      • California
      • Colorado
      • Connecticut
      • Delaware
      • District of Columbia
      • Florida
      • Georgia
      • Hawaii
      • Idaho
      • Illinois
      • Indiana
      • Iowa
      • Kansas
      • Kentucky
      • Louisiana
      • Maine
      • Maryland
      • Massachusetts
      • Michigan
      • Minnesota
      • Mississippi
      • Missouri
      • Montana
      • Nebraska
      • Nevada
      • New Hampshire
      • New Jersey
      • New Mexico
      • New York
      • North Carolina
      • North Dakota
      • Ohio
      • Oklahoma
      • Oregon
      • Pennsylvania
      • Rhode Island
      • South Carolina
      • South Dakota
      • Tennessee
      • Texas
      • Utah
      • Vermont
      • Virginia
      • Washington
      • West Virginia
      • Wisconsin
      • Wyoming
  • Tax Topics
    • Tax Basics
    • Personal Income Taxes
    • Sales Taxes
    • Property Taxes
    • Corporate Income Taxes
    • Other Revenue Sources
  • Publications
    • All Reports By Year
    • Multi-State Reports
    • Policy Briefs
    • Reports Using ITEP Data
  • Press Center
  • Donate

Corporate Income Taxes

Policy Briefs

  • Corporate Income Tax Apportionment and the "Single Sales Factor" - 08/2012 (Updated)
  • Combined Reporting of State Corporate Income Taxes: A Primer - 08/2011
  • "Nowhere Income" and the Throwback Rule: A Primer - 08/2011
  • The "QPAI" Corporate Tax Break: How it Works and How States Can Respond - 08/2011
  • How State Corporate Income Taxes Work - 07/2011
  • Corporate Income Tax Disclosure: Why It Matters - 05/2004

 

Featured Reports

  • Corporate Tax Dodging In the Fifty States, 2008-2010 - 12/2011
  • Corporate Taxpayers & Corporate Tax Dodgers - 11/2011

 

Other Reports

  • IDAHO: IDACorp-- Biggest Winner Under Property Tax Plan-- Pays Nothing in State Income Taxes - 02/2013
  • ILLINOIS: Illinois Must Ignore CME's Tax Tantrum: Statement from Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy - 06/2011
  • MULTIPLE STATES: Why Large Corporations Can Do Business in Your State Tax-Free - The "Substantial Nexus" Test - 12/2006

 

Testimony

  • RHODE ISLAND: ITEP's Testimony on Combined Reporting Legislation - 05/2011
  • MARYLAND: Testimony before the Maryland Business Tax Commission: Combined Reporting - 11/2010
  • MARYLAND: Testimony before the Maryland Business Tax Commission - 07/2009
  • NEW YORK: ITEP Testimony on Corporate Tax Reform before the New York State Senate Select Committee on Budget and Tax Reform - 05/2009

 

  • Home |
  • Mission & History |
  • ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model Overview |
  • Policy Briefs |
  • All Reports By Year |
  • Join Our Email List |
  • Support ITEP |
  • Contact

Copyright 2013 ITEP. All rights reserved.